Moi j'ai le cam roller stock 1989 turbo. Je sais que Gary avait testé plusieurs camshafts à la track avec son Reliant et son Daytona. Il a fait son meilleur temp avec le Reliant avec un cam roller stock 1989. Ils dit que les résultats changent tout dépendant du niveau de boost;
"I have my own theory on camshafts for the 2.2 engines based on the cams I have used and the engines I have run. If your planning on running boost no higher then 18-20 psi (typical S-60 package) then a larger camshaft is not a bad idea, however....
If your planning on running BIG BOOST (25-30 psi) I find that cam selection seems to be less of an issue. It sounds strange but let me explain; In the K-car I didn't like the way the S-60 cam looked so I pulled it out and replaced it with a 89 roller cam. I fully expected to lose some MPH or ET at the track the next time I went racing and was amazed to see the car go 1 mph faster then it ever went before! If your running the high boost it seems that a larger camshaft may not be needed, indeed the larger cam maybe letting some hi-boost escape out the exhaust valve from the larger overlap of the camshaft design.
This had been noted on 2 cars running 30 psi of boost, in one case back to back runs were done the same day and the factory roller returned best ET'S and MPH'S of the day.
Relentless is running 10's on a factory roller cam! "
Le cam Super60 est aussi reconnu pour s'user rapidement, Stéphane m'en avait déja parlé.
Bruno Côté
---------------------- '88 Dodge Daytona C/S 2.2 Turbo II
